<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : Ruth Bader Ginsburg</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Ruth Bader Ginsburg</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Emily Interviews Ruth Bader Ginsburg</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/07/08/emily-interviews-ruth-bader-ginsburg.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6102</guid><dc:creator>Hanna Rosin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6102.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6102</wfw:commentRss><description>Our own Emily has a fantastic and revealing Q &amp;amp; A with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg up on the New York Times website today. Their conversation ranges from Roe v. Wade to summer camp in the Adirondacks to Savana Redding to losing her shoe under the...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/07/08/emily-interviews-ruth-bader-ginsburg.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6102" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Emily+Bazelon/default.aspx">Emily Bazelon</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sonia+sotomayor/default.aspx">sonia sotomayor</category></item><item><title>Savana Redding's School Was Wrong to Strip Search Her</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/06/25/savana-redding-s-school-was-wrong-to-strip-search-her.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5983</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5983.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5983</wfw:commentRss><description>The Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional this morning the strip search of Savana Redding, the 13-year-old student who was supposed to have somehow been hiding prescription ibuprofen in her underwear, only wasn't. That's a relief. At oral argument, some...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/06/25/savana-redding-s-school-was-wrong-to-strip-search-her.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5983" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/strip+search/default.aspx">strip search</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/fourth+amendment/default.aspx">fourth amendment</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/savana+redding/default.aspx">savana redding</category></item><item><title>AT&amp;T v. Hulteen: The Ghost of Bad Supreme Court Rulings Past</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/at-t-v-hulteen-the-ghost-of-bad-supreme-court-rulings-past.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5614</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5614.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5614</wfw:commentRss><description>Agreed, Dahlia, that Justice Ginsburg is carefully applying the law as she sees it in her dissent in AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen . Her problem is a bad old ruling that haunts this case and that all but one of her male colleagues refused to banish. In General...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/at-t-v-hulteen-the-ghost-of-bad-supreme-court-rulings-past.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5614" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/AT_2600_amp_3B00_T+v.+Hulteen/default.aspx">AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/empathy/default.aspx">empathy</category></item><item><title>Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ain't No Oprah Winfrey</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ain-t-no-oprah-winfrey.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5612</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5612.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5612</wfw:commentRss><description>The Supreme Court ruled, 7-2 yesterday in AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen , that women denied credits toward their pension for their pregnancies in the 1960s and '70s—before it became illegal—were not the victims of gender discrimination. The question came down to...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ain-t-no-oprah-winfrey.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5612" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Supreme+Court/default.aspx">Supreme Court</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/AT_2600_amp_3B00_T+v.+Hulteen/default.aspx">AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/empathy/default.aspx">empathy</category></item><item><title>Ginsburg on Why the Supreme Court Needs Another Woman</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/07/ginsburg-on-why-the-supreme-court-needs-another-woman.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5513</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5513.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5513</wfw:commentRss><description>Dahlia , Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would surely agree with you that it's long past time to rub out the equation that a woman justice equals a second-rate one. To make the case for why she needs a female colleague (or colleagues), she took the unusual...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/07/ginsburg-on-why-the-supreme-court-needs-another-woman.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5513" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Supreme+Court/default.aspx">Supreme Court</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/strip+search/default.aspx">strip search</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/savanna+redding/default.aspx">savanna redding</category></item><item><title>No Courtroom Drama</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/23/no-courtroom-drama.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4704</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4704.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4704</wfw:commentRss><description>Despite the extraordinary long-distance diagnostic skills of Sen. Jim Bunning , R. Ky., who predicted at a Saturday Republican fundraising dinner that she’ll be dead in nine months , Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took the bench for oral argument this morning,...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/23/no-courtroom-drama.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/cancer/default.aspx">cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Jim+Bunning/default.aspx">Jim Bunning</category></item><item><title>Tireless Justice Ginsburg</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/18/tireless-justice-ginsburg.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4665</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4665.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4665</wfw:commentRss><description>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was supposed to give the keynote address last week at a conference on women's equality and the law, at Rutgers School of Law-Newark. She couldn't make it, because of her recent cancer-related surgery. But she called, en route...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/18/tireless-justice-ginsburg.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4665" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pregnancy/default.aspx">pregnancy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pregnancy+discrimination/default.aspx">pregnancy discrimination</category></item></channel></rss>