<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : NOW</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/NOW/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: NOW</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Macaca Pancakes, Yum!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/14/macaca-pancakes-yum.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1529</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1529.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1529</wfw:commentRss><description>Granted, Tim , the timing is convenient for Patti Solis Doyle's mommy crisis. But couldn't both versions of events be true for Hillary's former campaign manager? Say your life's work is going down in flames—to the point that One Life to Live seems more...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/14/macaca-pancakes-yum.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1529" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women/default.aspx">women</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Democrats/default.aspx">Democrats</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/abortion/default.aspx">abortion</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Gloria+Steinem/default.aspx">Gloria Steinem</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/NOW/default.aspx">NOW</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Patti+Solis+Doyle/default.aspx">Patti Solis Doyle</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Erica+Jong/default.aspx">Erica Jong</category></item><item><title>RE: The Waah Waah Sisterhood</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/29/re-the-waah-waah-sisterhood.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1184</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1184.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1184</wfw:commentRss><description>Rachael I don’t think you’re going to find anyone on this blog racing to second Karen Von Hahn ’s simplistic take on feminism, any more than we swallowed the NOW tantrum last night or the Steinem logic earlier this month. The split you’re sketching isn’t...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/29/re-the-waah-waah-sisterhood.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1184" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/NOW/default.aspx">NOW</category></item><item><title>The Waah-Waah Sisterhood</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/29/the-waah-waah-sisterhood.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1180</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1180.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1180</wfw:commentRss><description>So, some folks are worried that " feminism is out of style ." Gee, could it have anything to do with stuff like this ? Apologies if I seem too flippant. But I do sense a common thread between Karen von Hahn's column in the Globe and Mail (go read it if...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/29/the-waah-waah-sisterhood.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1180" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/abortion/default.aspx">abortion</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/NOW/default.aspx">NOW</category></item></channel></rss>