<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : Julia Roberts</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Julia Roberts</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Old Spice</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4908</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4908.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4908</wfw:commentRss><description>Susannah . The headline here is actually kind of worse than “Julia Roberts is OLD.” The headline — or subhed — is the coy suggestion that “Julia Roberts is a superstar, but her box-office reign might be over.” Then the piece is packed with arguments (as...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/ageism/default.aspx">ageism</category></item><item><title>One Wedding, Three Children and ... a Funeral?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4911</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4911</wfw:commentRss><description>More for Susannah on Julia Roberts: I don't think either Dahlia or I were motivated to tear into that Newsweek piece on her by our undying love for America's sweetheart. Rather, we were struck by the article's disingenuousness, what I called its "eyelash-batting"...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4911" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>That's Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4907</guid><dc:creator>Susannah Breslin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4907.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4907</wfw:commentRss><description>Count me out on crying "sexism!" when it comes to Newsweek 's characterization of Julia Roberts as "Hollywood ancient." And that's exactly what the author said — Hollywood ancient — and you know what? He's absolutely right. By the response here, you'd...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4907" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/movies/default.aspx">movies</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sexism/default.aspx">sexism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/celebrity/default.aspx">celebrity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Pretty (Old) Woman</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4905</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4905.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4905</wfw:commentRss><description>Yuck. Like Dahlia , I hate the way this Newsweek article on Julia Roberts perpetuates sexist assumptions — 41-year-old women are "ancient"! Time off to raise children = career suicide! — while batting its eyelashes innocently. The author is effectively...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4905" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4904</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4904.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4904</wfw:commentRss><description>Jamie Foxx. Paul Giamatti. Benicio Del Toro. Liev Schreiber. Guy Pearce. Philip Seymour Hoffman . Pretty safe bet that if any one of these 41-year-old actors had been the subject of this Newsweek piece they wouldn’t have been run through the gender double-standard...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4904" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>She's Still Got It</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/12/she-s-still-got-it.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4605</guid><dc:creator>Willa Paskin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4605.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4605</wfw:commentRss><description>The New York Times just ran a piece about Julia Roberts , who's coming out of self-imposed semiretirement in March with Duplicity , a comedic caper co-starring grizzly man Clive Owen. Roberts has been taking it relatively easy since 2001 , in which time...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/02/12/she-s-still-got-it.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4605" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Arnold+Schwarzenegger/default.aspx">Arnold Schwarzenegger</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Movie+stars/default.aspx">Movie stars</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Renee+Zellwegger/default.aspx">Renee Zellwegger</category></item><item><title>Privacy Is in the Eye of the Beholder</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/24/privacy-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3363</guid><dc:creator>Bonnie Goldstein</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3363.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3363</wfw:commentRss><description>Bad juju ? The National Enquirer lived down to its tabloid expectations and gave the press a sweetheart of a bone to chew in the weeks before the political conventions. Mickey’s MSM should send them a thank-you note. Rachael is right. The Edwards’ personal...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/24/privacy-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3363" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Reille+Hunter/default.aspx">Reille Hunter</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/affairs/default.aspx">affairs</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Edwards+love+child/default.aspx">Edwards love child</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Erin+Brokovich/default.aspx">Erin Brokovich</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Susan+Sarandon/default.aspx">Susan Sarandon</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/elizabeth+edwards/default.aspx">elizabeth edwards</category></item></channel></rss>