<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bradley Effect?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/09/bradley-effect.aspx</link><description>With all due respect to Chris Matthews, and a few of Slate ' s very own pundits , I don't buy the theory that the " Bradley Effect " explains why Obama lost New Hampshire—that voters "lied" to pollsters to seem progressive. Here's why, via Marc Ambinder</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>