<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Critics of Sotomayor Aren't Guilty of Racism or Sexism. They're Guilty of Ageism!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/27/critics-of-sotomayor-aren-t-guilty-of-racism-or-sexism-they-re-guilty-of-ageism.aspx</link><description>Meghan, I agree that the issue isn't really one of reverse-discrimination , even if think Hanna is right that Sotomayor's views on affirmative action may sound dated to some contemporary ears. Rather, the issue, I think, is similar to one that arose during</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>