<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Marriage of Love and Politics</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/26/the-marriage-of-love-and-politics.aspx</link><description>Three cheers for Stephanie Coontz's piece in the New York Times today in defense of taking marriage private . She asks: Why do people—gay or straight—need the state’s permission to marry? For most of Western history, they didn’t, because marriage was</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>