-
sponsorship
Domestic violence being an atrocity, I have tried to ignore
the rather disgusting “Crihanna” tit for tat that’s competing for shelf space
beside Michelle Obama on newsstands across the country. But this new study out
from Boston University spun my head:
Nearly
half of the 200 Boston teenagers interviewed for an informal poll said pop star
Rihanna was responsible for the beating she allegedly took at the hands of her
boyfriend, fellow music star Chris Brown, in February.
Of those questioned, ages 12 to 19, 71 percent said that arguing was a normal
part of a relationship; 44 percent said fighting was a routine occurrence.
The results of the survey, conducted by the Boston Public Health Commission
across the city and equally among boys and girls, are startling for local
health workers who see a generation of youths who seem to have grown
accustomed, even insensitive, to domestic violence.
"I think you'd have to be pretty jaded if you weren't startled by
it," said Casey Corcoran, director of the health commission's new Start
Strong program.
Maybe. But I have to say I’m not that surprised: In college, I participated in a program called “Community
Health Educators” (the founders have scaled up their model via a national nonprofit
called “Peer Health Educators” that I strongly endorse). The idea is that, because
many local school districts don’t have a budget for health education, kids not too
much older than high school students would travel to local schools—in my case,
an urban setting with a mix of white, black and latino students—bearing
lectures and props and index cards for awkward questions. And that this would
fill the gap. I taught different individual subjects for two years, and in my
senior year I had the chance to participate in a pilot program where I’d see
the same kids every week, teaching the entire curriculum over the course of ten
weeks.
This preamble is by way of saying that I saw the way 17-19
year olds (in a “second chance” high school, where some of the kids had dropped
out or been through the juvenile justice system) absorbed the range of topics
we discussed, from contraception (the wooden penis was a hit), nutrition (“sugar
is not a food group”) to drug and alcohol abuse (one kid asked us, in the
throes of senior spring, if we had ever been drunk). They were on the whole
receptive, if restless and often skeptical of our preachy tone. Learning about
hallucinogens certainly livened up what could have been an afternoon of
trigonometry.
But, far and away, the subject that penetrated the least was our
unit on “relationships and abuse.” This dealt with date rape, molestation by
adults, domestic violence and bullying. It never sunk in. Worse, while the guys
were boorish in the extreme—one male student in one class said if a girl “snitched”
on him for sexual assault, “I’d kill her”—the
girls, I found, were even more likely to say that a male-on-female altercation
involving kicking, punching and hitting was a girl’s fault. (“Why’d she make
him mad?” etc.) Even kids who could rattle off the ins and outs of
contraception without shame (one girl in my class had a toddler already) regressed mightily when it
came to the issue of gender and violence. It was, honestly, chilling. What's that about?
-
sponsorship
Dahlia, Jessica,
Like you, I'm not entirely surprised by the depressing Girl Scout stats. But two thoughts spring to mind: First, I wonder what a poll of girls 9-12 would show. In my anecdotal experience with pre-teens this past election (my mother ran a secondary school that I used to spend time in), the girls in the 10-year-old range were picking up the excitement of the fact that Hillary and Sarah Palin were strong female candidates, and little of the debate over it. Second, adolescent girls are hitting that moment when they do begin to doubt themselves (the Reviving Ophelia moment) and so I wonder if this age group was particularly susceptible to absorbing the glass ceiling message. Just speculation. It'd be interesting to know more.
-
sponsorship
Dahlia, you're right that at face value, those Girl Scouts stats are disheartening. But the silver lining may be that these girls are thinking about themselves in leadership positions in the first place. As a teen, I never considered women in politics at all. I was not an especially political adolescent, but I didn't think about the glass ceiling for women running for office because I wasn't even in the room. That girls are even considering those barriers in the first place might be a small step in the right direction. At least Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton are now sharing brain space with Taylor Swift and Zac Efron.
-
sponsorship
Courtesy of Feministing, a new study launched by the Girl Scout Research Institute shows that girls between the ages of 13 and 17 came away from this past presidential election with some very mixed feelings about females and power. On the one hand, these young women report big increases in engagement in politics, their confidence in discussing political issues, and their sense of their own power to change things in this country. But the numbers also show a huge uptick in their awareness of barriers for women. For instance, 43 percent of girls strongly believe that "girls have to work harder than boys in order to gain positions of leadership." (Just 25 percent of girls agreed with that statement only one year ago.) And the percentage of girls who believe that "both men and women have an equal chance of getting a leadership position" has declined from 35 percent to 24 percent in one short year. Zounds.
None of this surprises me. This election seems to have inspired and discouraged most of the women I know in just about equal measure. But I hadn’t stopped to think about how that would be experienced by a 15-year-old girl, who suddenly feels powerful and smart enough to change the world but deeply doubtful that she will get the chance.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?