-
On Convictions, a thoughtful post from Rich Ford, in response to Kim and Melinda. Rich is the author of The Race Card (much more here). In thinking about whether Clinton supporters who say they'll back McCain are motivated by racism, he writes:
Of course there are a lot of explanations that don’t involve racism. Maybe some Democrats for McCain really buy into the experience line; maybe some voted for Clinton mainly due to gender solidarity and actually prefer many of McCain’s policy positions. Personally, I suspect most Democrats for McCain are driven not by racism but a much more widespread, simpler, and more primal motivation: spite.
I suspect a lot of the reason Obama supporters want to tar every Democrat gone over to McCain as a racist is that they suspect that some unsavory motivation underlies this strange shift in political alliances and jump to the most uncharitable conclusion: racism. Juries are apt to do this in discrimination cases, too: If the employer is acting out of favoritism, vindictiveness, or spite, they figure he’s probably a racist, too. But in fact the likelihood of another unsavory motivation, sufficient in itself to explain the decision, cuts against the inference of racism: If Clintonites could be motivated to support McCain by spite alone, then we have less of a reason to suspect them of racism.
Oh, by the way, before the hate mail from Clinton supporters pours in: I have no doubt that many Obama supporters would have succumbed to a spiteful solidarity with McCain had Obama lost to Clinton. (Oh, oh: Is that just going to get me more hate mail?) Crushing disappointment and a resultant spiteful backlash has been a real risk in this primary of potential 'historic firsts': Someone had to come in second, and some profound symbolic triumph over bigotry and oppression had to be delayed. That’s hard to take, and we can expect the McCain campaign to try to capitalize on the resentment of the losing faction. I think Obama could probably win the election without the racist vote, but he may have a hard time winning without the spiteful vote. Let's hope those liberals for McCain decide they like their faces enough not separate them from their noses.
-
But, back to living women who are entertaining the thought of McCain-ing. ...You know how during the primaries, we kept writing that supporting Obama over Hillary didn't make us woman-haters or even bad feminists? Belatedly, with the help of my McCain-flirting friend, it occurs to me that the opposite obvious point also needs to be spelled out: Supporting Hillary, or now McCain, over Obama does not a racist make, either. When I saw what my friend wrote about her son being branded that way just because his family supported Hillary, it kind of broke my heart and made me think about how I might not want to jump into Obamamania, either, if that had happened to my baby. For me, her perspective was a reminder that candidates are to some degree held responsible for the behavior of their supporters, so it isn't only Obama who needs to show those disappointed Hillary voters some respect. (And yes, I am looking in the mirror on this one.)
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?