-
sponsorship
Despite her courage, Jess, though Marisa Tomei performed her heart out as the pole dancer Mickey Rourke courts in The Wrestler, her (OK, let's call her "feminist") character didn't quite sell me—showing more compassion than passion in the film's fleeting love story. It may be a chick flick, but it ain't no romance. Speaking of, while everybody has a different reason why Millionaire will win the best picture statue tonight, for me, Slumdog's happily ever after fade out puts it solidly ahead. The Bollywood ending wins by a mile in a field where the only other love stories are the doomed courtship of Brad and Cate in Benjamin Button and The Reader's bordering-on-child-molestation sexual trysts between Kate and impossibly young actor David Kross. (Parenthetically, I wonder whether Harvey Weinstein—if Wall-E, the other love conquers all narrative in this year's top films, had been nominated in the BP category, as many fans and critics opined it should have—would have run a whisper campaign charging cartoon-robot exploitation?) Meantime, as we wait for confirmation of the Slumdog sweep, in honor of romance classic It Happened One Night's 1935 Academy Award shut-out of The Thin Man, I heartily recommend reading Slate's Nick and Nora of movie-criticism trash talk, the matchless Dana Stevens and Troy Patterson.
-
sponsorship
I came away from The Wrestler feeling exactly as you did, Hanna. This was a movie for women. The common denominator here isn’t just that Rourke and Tomei have allowed themselves to be exploited and objectified. It’s that screaming, frothing men are the reason each has become a busted shell. This is a movie about fantasies. But the female characters long for connection while the males long for action figures. Even the men Rourke serves at the supermarket meat counter (yes MEAT COUNTER ... well, nobody said it was a subtle film, as my friend Liz observed last night) are aggressive and brutal.
I don’t know that the whole men-as-animals subtext turns this into a chick flick. I found the violent bits so unbearable that I spent a lot of the movie deeply involved with my Milk Duds. And as Jessica notes, even if she were played by Dame Judi Dench, that whole stripper-with-a-heart-of-gold character can never be anything but a dreary cliché. Still, The Wrestler lodged itself someplace in my chest after I saw it lost weekend and it’s still sitting there. There was one moment when Rourke looked straight into the camera when he was begging his daughter’s forgiveness, and I’d swear that whatever he let loose in that instant caused me brain damage at the other end. Yes, he deserves the Oscar, and, yes, he’s crazier than a moonbat. But what this movie says about men and their dreams is probably less chick flick that horror movie.
-
sponsorship
I find the notion that The Wrestler is a feminist flick intriguing, but ultimately it's problematic. Although Rourke's character is trapped in an endless cycle of bodily abuse and exploitation, the biological women in the film are not particularly shining examples of feminist thinking. Marisa Tomei plays that same old trope, the hooker (or in this case, stripper) with a heart of gold. Since Tomei is such a fine actress, she keeps the role from devolving into that clichéd territory. As our own Dana Stevens put it, "I hope Marisa Tomei won't be overlooked for what I consider the single best female performance of the year, supporting or otherwise. She's smart, earthy, and astonishingly real in a role that could have foundered in cheap sentimentality." But still, Tomei's character is pretty one-dimensional. She lacks flaws either to her earthy personality or her slammin' bod. And what about the other woman in the movie, Rourke's daughter Stephanie, played by Evan Rachel Wood? The wrestler tugs on her vulnerable heart strings, only to let her down as he has throughout her childhood. In a way, every character in The Wrestler is trapped in a larger system beyond his or her control. Mickey Rourke doesn't deserve a special citation for feminist filmmaking for being trapped in this way, but agreed, Hanna: He does deserve that Oscar.
Rourke already won best actor honors at last night's Independent Spirit Awards, and his acceptance speech was definitely 10 times more entertaining than whatever bleeped out pleasantries he'll probably have to offer tonight. Check out the rambling six-minute monologue below. This is what he had to say about Marisa Tomei's work: "I wanna thank, uh, who else? Oh! Melissa? Marisa Tomei. Goddamn she had to do all this with a bare ass, and she brought it. Is she here? Not many girls can climb the pole. You understand what I'm saying? She climbed the pole, and she did it well, and it was a very courageous performance."
-
sponsorship
Whether or not to see The Wrestler is a common argument among my couple friends these days. But I was surprised to learn that The Wrestler, for which Mickey Rourke is sure to win an Oscar tonight, has a distinctly feminist edge. Or at least it settles an old score. In the movie, Rourke plays an aging wrestler who continues to abuse his body for the pleasure of the crowd. The abuse is both casual (tanning salons, hair dyes) and extreme (staple guns to the chest, falling from heights onto barbed wire). The crucifixion metaphor is always in the background. Usually when the exploitation of the male body is a theme, the context is noble sport, or test of manhood—boxers face off like warriors, quarterbacks take one for the team. But here the context is pure exploitation. What's happening to his body is the exact equivalent of what's happening to the character played by Marisa Tomei—an aging stripper who can't persuade any of her clients to buy a lap dance. The wrestler often refers to himself as an "aging piece of meat," and he is always objectified by the camera—shot from behind or from the chest down. He's not a victim in the straightforward sense—the wrestlers are all very polite and discuss their moves in advance. But he is in the second-wave sense—trapped in a larger system that gives him no other choice. And by the way, he definitely deserves that Oscar.
-
sponsorship
The Oscars are Sunday night (maybe you heard). When Kate Winslet finally gets awarded the shiny, gold-plated, bald phallus she's been so volubly longing for, I'm going to feel tempted to throw the remote at the television while damning Academy voters for rewarding just an OK performance in a dreadful film. Come on, Academy! Aren't the Oscars about rewarding quality acting? Ha-ha, I kid. Of course not! As this year demonstrates, even better than most, the Oscars are all about rewarding compelling campaign narratives.
Front-runners Kate Winslet, Mickey Rourke, and Heath Ledger (nominated for performances in The Reader, The Wrestler, and The Dark Knight respectively) all have just such a narrative, and you can tell because each of their victories is easy to imagine as a scene in a movie. (Try to do this trick for any of their fellow nominees—it's much harder.) Winslet's win is the moment the heroine's childhood dreams all come true. Rourke's is the instant the hero's comeback is finally complete. Ledger's victory
actually will be a scene in a movie, the inevitable Heath Ledger Story. (Can't you see it? A packed auditorium of the best actors in the world rising to give a bittersweet standing ovation to his immense talent.) If any of this trio wins this weekend, it will have something to do with singular performances and a whole lot more to do with their real-life stories and how those stories have been pitched to the voting public. (A similar logic applies to Slumdog Millionaire, which should win because the field is weak, people dig it, and, as the unheralded, multi-ethnic crowd pleaser, it is the Barack Obama of the best picture category.)
Excellent backstories have propelled many past Oscar winners. To name just a few of those many, think of Jennifer Hudson, Matt and Ben, the coronation of Julia Roberts, or even someone like Al Pacino, who won for Scent of a Woman not because it was his (or the year's) best work but because he had been Oscar-less for too long. Academy voters have proved again and again that they love a great story as much as a great performance—they're movie people after all; great stories are their business. It's about time I stopped being surprised.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?