The XX Factor: What women really think.



  • Guns and Roses


    Just wanted to flag this great piece in The Root about Venus and Serena Williams—not simply because my sister and I played competitive tennis as youngsters, and were constantly being compared to the Compton-born phenoms—but because author Jewel Edwards is preaching hard truths about standards of beauty when it comes to athletics. Extra points to this piece for subtlety; it took me a while to realize that Edwards is male! His awesome point:

    Black female athletes, on the other hand, are put in the unique position where developing their bodies makes them the object of spectacle. For female athletes, the perennial insult is, "You look like a man." As a result, any girl—black or white—involved in sports has to make choices that a boy never has to make.

    That’s a very important insight; and the tough calls faced by female athletes extend not just to physical appearance but to lifestyle choices, such as when to have a baby, get hitched, or embark upon puberty.

    Samantha brought up Michelle Obama’s guns getting lots of attention on Tuesday evening. (I thought that going sleeveless in February was a bit gauche—but that’s another tale.) Obama looks great, but that kind of positive reinforcement is a stark counterpoint to the ogling and snark that attends the biceps of the decorated Williams sisters. It’s clearly hurtful:

    Serena, when asked about her body yet again, said, "Just because I have large bosoms, and I have a big ass [laughter], I swear, my waist is 30 inches, 29 to 30 inches, it’s really small! I have the smallest waist, but just because I have those two assets, it looks like I’m not fit."

    Imagine that! You are the most dominant person in your sport in the world, but you consistently have to defend having your curves. Listening to commentators persistently speculate and scrutinize Serena about her weight and fitness—which are metaphors for her body—is like having the buttocks and breasts of Hottentot Venus debated for public consumption.

    Yes, imagine that. More extra points for bringing up Saartje Bartman—made famous once more by inaugural poet Elizabeth Alexander in this phenomenal work. But in terms of beauty norms: Really, what’s the difference between upscale yoga arms and those that can bench 200?

  • Curves Ahead


    Except for a bit of mostly innocuous fun-poking, the Beijing Olympics have pretty much steered clear of any sexist slip-ups. Until yesterday, when reports surfaced of the International Table Tennis Federation’s latest strategy for reversing low attendance to its matches. Now that gymnastics and beach volleyball are over, the ITTF is looking to draw attention to the sexier side of table tennis, urging lady players to adjust their competition outfits to flaunt more “curves.”

    Real considerate, ITTF. Being Olympians and all, I’m sure the lady table tennis players don’t have any more important things to worry about or stress over than their appearances! This scenario reminds me of a scene from A League of Their Own, in which Geena Davis’ character, Dottie Hinson, sees the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League uniform for the first time. Recognizing its counterintuitive design, Dottie points out that (beyond being exploitive of her body) the garment stands to significantly hinder her athletic performance exclaiming, “I have to squat in that?”

    What would Dottie Hinson say to the ITTF if she knew that so little has changed for female athletes since the AAGPBL forced her to bunt and slide in a poorly disguised cocktail dress?

    One of the most inspiring aspects of seeing women compete in the Olympics is watching the stereotypically separate spheres of femininity and athleticism collide. From Dara Torres to Natalie du Toit, the lady Olympians’ blend of determination, strength, and elegance consistently rises above public preconceptions, continually redefining the archetype of an athletic woman. Requiring female athletes to look hot for their onlookers would detract from the athletic and social advancements these women are making.

    Don’t get me wrong. I see nothing wrong with Olympians, male or female, choosing to flaunt their flawless bodies for my viewing pleasure. Props to Japan’s Naomi Yotsumoto for vamping it up of her own volition. Michael Phelps also seems to love the glint of his hairless body in the spotlight, and you won’t hear me complaining. But the ITTF’s request for skimpier female uniforms is pretty sexist, particularly when the request admittedly serves no functional purpose. These athletes are in Beijing to compete in the name of national pride and international community, for a shot at distinction in their impossibly competitive field. We shouldn’t be concerned about what they wear. (And frankly, if they want to make the case for shock value, perhaps the ITTF would prefer to revert back to the uniform worn by the original Olympians.)
  • The Meaning of Dara


     

    The following is a guest post from former competitive swimmer Michelle Brafman, who teaches and writes fiction in Washington:

    Dara Torres. Dara Torres. God, it would be so easy to hate her. Let's start with the abs that defy nature, maddening proof that a 41-year-old mother can successfully model a bikini. There are the masseuses and trainers who knead her muscles and stretch her limbs myriad times a day to flush out lactic acid built up from swimming laps and pumping iron while a nanny cares for her toddler. I'm guessing she's not folding much of her own laundry, but I could be wrong.

    I'm not bitter. Really, I'm not. If I sound a little obsessed though, it's for good reason. If I had a quarter for every time someone asked me "So what do you think of that Dara Torres?" I could fill every parking meter in the northwest quadrant of Washington, D.C.  Why do people associate me with Dara? Believe me, it's not the abs. Dara and I are of the same vintage; I swam competitively for almost 20 years, and like Dara, I was a drop-dead sprinter, not an Olympian but an NCAA All-American.

    My daughter's recent foray into competitive swimming has catapulted me back to this chapter of my life, particularly the swim meets: the thick summer air scented with chlorine and mildewed towels, the national anthem performed slightly off-key, and the munchkin swimmers hooting and hollering for each other. By the last event, I'm fighting the urge to pull on my Land's End tankini and recruit one of the timers to run a clock on my own 25-meter freestyle.

    Last week, I traveled back to Milwaukee, my hometown, to visit a high-school friend and former swimming buddy; within hours of my arrival, we found ourselves in front of the Whitefish Bay high-school pool, sheets of rain pounding the roof of her minivan and drenching our clothes during our short sprint to the field house. We made our way past the faded canary-yellow lockers, up to the pool, to the record board that hung in the diving well. Phew. My 100-yard freestyle record, now more than two decades  old, still stands. We giggled at the absurdity of my pilgrimage—not my first, I confess—as we fanned our T-shirts and shorts under the warm air blasting out of the hair dryers. 

    Unlike Dara, I have no aspiration to break my record. I just like to know that it's there. I have new dreams, my strongest my humbling desire for my children to grow into happy, healthy, and compassionate beings. From watching footage of Dara and her daughter frolicking in the pool, I suspect that she shares my hopes. Dara and I have got dreams for ourselves, too. For the past eight years, I've spent the bulk of my free time writing fiction. I write after my children go to sleep, before they wake up, and during random cracks in the day. My house could be cleaner, our dinners more edible, and our cottons less wrinkled; my lower back is a mess, and I've written through elbow pain which has left me with a recurring case of tendonitis. I likely earn less per hour than we pay our teenage baby-sitters, and there are no guarantees that I will publish anything I write.

    There are no guarantees that Dara's enormous financial and emotional investment in her swimming will yield any hardware at Beijing. Athletes and artists gamble hours of sacrifice on a medal or a record, and the few who score big undoubtedly overcome hurdles along the way. Dara's suffered a torn meniscus, a bone spur in her shoulder, and various personal and professional hiccups. Writers suffer plenty of setbacks. I've received rejection letters that have made me want to throw in the keyboard, letters that demand to be shaken off so that I can plot another comeback. I always come back.

    In 10 years, I'm not going to remember the editors who have passed on my stories, and I probably won't think much about the ones who haven't. In the year 2018, will anyone recall if Dara broke the world record in the 50-meter freestyle or if she even medaled? Probably not. My hunch is that we will remember Dara Torres for redefining our notion of our collective potential, as a species. Body and mind. We will remember that three weeks after she gave birth, she broke an American record in the 50-freestyle, the most exacting physical and psychological race in competitive swimming. We will remember that she did it by training as smart as she did hard, and by plugging her ears and singing "la, la, la" when the skeptics got nasty.

    I'm fairly certain that I won't redefine any idea of a greater literary potential, but I'd be pretty happy if I realized my own. I'll keep at it. When my demons taunt me and I need to find my way to the junction of talent, heart and promise, I'll think: Dara Torres, Dara Torres.

    For more on Dara Torres, Slate's June Thomas and Josh Levin discuss her amazing form at Bloggingheads.tv.

Print This ArticlePRINT Discuss in the FrayDISCUSS
<November 2009>
SMTWTFS
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Syndication