-
Posted
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:29 PM
| By
E.J. Graff
While we are wringing our hands at Julia Roberts being portrayed as old at 41 (a mere babe!), let me take a schadenfreude moment to note a recent study's suggestion that men should be paying more attention to their biological clocks.
Remember Tony Randall, who made his first baby at age 77? Or Michael Douglas, Rupert Murdoch, Mick Jagger—all still churning out offspring in their elder years? Or Mr. Rahman, whose reproduction line Emily Y. noted below, still turning them out at 63? They might be a bit ... irresponsible. Older men's swimmers might still be strong enough to hit an egg, but the chromosomes they're carrying might be a bit weak. According to the U.K. Independent's Steve Connor, reporting on an Australian scientist's retrospective study of more than 33,000 children born in the United States between 1959 and 1965, older men's offspring are more likely to show "neural tube defects and a range of medical disorders of later life, such as schizophrenia, dyslexia, bipolar disorder and autism." These older fathers' children did less well on intelligence tests ... unlike the older mothers' children, who did better than those of younger moms.
It's kinda nice to know that women shouldn't be alone in worrying about our aging oeufs—that men should worry about their innermost parts, too. And perhaps it's useful to know that women should feel free to make babies while older—but should rely on a younger man's, um, input.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?