Slate's Bizbox



The XX Factor: Slate women blog about politics, etc...



PRINTDISCUSS
  • « Prev | Main | Next »

    The Charming Chris Matthews

    We all knew Chris Matthews was no Hillary-lover, but what he said on air this morning takes the cake: "The reason she's a U.S. Senator, the reason she's a candidate for President, the reason she may be a front-runner, is her husband messed around. That's how she got to be Senator from New York. We keep forgetting it. She didn't win it on the merits. ... " Nice. As Greg Sargent points out, what's egregious about this statement is that Matthews went right back to offering a reductive narrative about what voters do or don't like about Hillary. No wonder the commentators at MSNBC were so surprised when Hillary took the lead yesterday; they assumed all the undecided voters would go heavily for Obama, because they wanted it to happen that way. And now they are suggesting the Bradley effect is responsible. I agree with Juliet: I don't buy it. Like Emily Y, I'm hoping the commentators figure out by the next primary that they need to start offering up some more sophisticated analysis of just what is taking place.

    via TPM.

<January 2008>
SMTWTFS
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Syndication