Monday, December 17, 2007 - Posts
-
sponsorship
I'm seeing this remarkable photo of Hillary Clinton all over today. On Drudge, first and foremost, but also on blogs that are discussing it. Like Ann Althouse, I first reacted with disbelief. Then a million questions popped into my head. How much of our reaction to this photo is based on Hillary being a woman? Probably a lot. Is that fair? Probably not. On the other hand, if the rigors of the campaign trail are leaving her this bedraggled, how is she going to weather the demands of the presidency? Also, weren't Drudge and Hillary pals just a few months ago?
Lastly, I wonder if Hillary can use this to her advantage in a small way. I've never cared for her personality or her politics, but as a woman, I'm sympathetic. I feel for her. No one likes to see pictures of themselves having a bad hair day, or after missing a few trips to the gym. And that's without the fate of a presidential campaign—her life's ambition—hanging precariously in the balance. The sympathy doesn't last long when I remember the way her campaign has tried to exploit other candidate's perceived weaknesses (see: Obama, drugs), but for once my visceral reaction toward her is not one of immediate dislike.
-
sponsorship
Bill Clinton's remarks on "Charlie Rose" last week had more than a whiff of frustration. They made Hillary's campaign seem a little desperate. And so it's not surprising to read this morning that some of her advisers wish he would tone it down. I wonder if he should just shut up altogether for a while. I know Bill is her contra-Oprah celebrity asset, but he is making her look small by comparison while he flails around. Forgive the psychobabble, but he seems like a husband who either wants something for his wife too badly, or is acting that way to cover an act of subconcious but supreme sabotage.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?