Thursday, November 08, 2007 - Posts
-
A nice point, Emily, about the dangers of looking at Sandra Day O’Connor through pink-colored glasses. You’re right to say that there are heaps of women judges who don’t employ O’Connor’s Miz Fixit hospital-corners jurisprudential style. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Read More...
-
Dahlia , Emily —Do you really believe there is a female style of judging—pragmatic and non-ideological—and that O'Connor embodies it? Doesn't Ginsburg operate from a clear set of principals—do you constantly wonder where she'll come down before an opinion Read More...
-
The man is a nut magnet, as we can tell in just a glance at today's front page of The New York Times. Above the fold: the former mayor with his new best friend Pat Robertson , who is not taken seriously by any evangelicals I'm aware of. Below: Former Read More...
-
Another thought: If O'Connor's pragmatic, this-case-only approach to judging is particularly female, then maybe that helps explain why male commentators tended to excoriate her for it. I don't think this explains all the frustration with her jurisprudence Read More...
-
I miss Sandra Day O’Connor. I always forget how much I miss her until I see her talk , as I did yesterday, at a conference at the Law Library of Congress on the need for competent counsel. The conference was co-sponsored by the Constitution Project. The Read More...
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?