<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Who You Calling Negative?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/2008/02/25/who-you-calling-negative.aspx</link><description>On a conference call with Clinton advisers just now, a reporter asks why the campaign is using harsh words against Barack Obama, given that previous negative attacks haven’t played well with voters. Communications Director Howard Wolfson weighs in: “Every</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>