<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Louisiana's Muddled, Confusing, Inexplicable Version of &amp;quot;Democracy&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/2008/01/24/louisiana-s-muddled-confusing-irrational-version-of-democracy.aspx</link><description>This is the first entry in what may become a Trailhead series called "The Neglected" on primaries and caucuses nobody cares about. If you thought the Iowa caucuses were undemocratic , then you obviously aren't a Louisiana Republican. On Tuesday night,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>