Slate's Bizbox



Trailhead: A campaign blog.



PRINTDISCUSS
  • « Prev | Main | Next »

    “So-Called Pledged Delegates”

    She wasn’t misspeaking this time. Hillary Clinton truly, honestly believes that pledged delegates are going to change their minds and this will help her win the nomination.

    When she said this in her Philadelphia Daily News interview the other day, I figured it was a fluke:

    And also remember that pledged delegates in most states are not pledged. You know, there is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody. They’re just like superdelegates.

    But then she repeated it in a curious new interview with Time’s Mark Halperin:

    [A]s you know so well, Mark, every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose. We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment.

    That’s right. “So-called pledged delegates.” So now, we’re to assume, it’s not just superdelegates who will overturn the pledged delegate count. Pledged delegates are going to help overturn it, too. At this rate, why hold elections in the first place? Let’s skip the rest of the primaries and go right to the convention, where all the so-called pledged delegates can get down to the business of ignoring the people’s votes.

    The Clinton camp vehemently denies that it will actively pursue Obama’s pledged delegates. But then why float the possibility? It makes zero sense strategically. True, no one puts a gun to the heads of pledged delegates and forces them to vote one way or another. But most of them would never go switch their vote—that would mean burning bridges, betraying friends, and reversing the will of their own constituents. And from a PR perspective, it’s disastrous. The Clinton camp has been screaming “disenfranchisement” in Florida and Michigan. Do they really want to push an idea that would flush real votes down the toilet?

    What began as a series of casual asides—first by Harold Ickes, then by Clinton herself—is now starting to look a coordinated effort. We don't ask this question lightly, but what are they smoking?

About Christopher Beam

  • Christopher Beam is a Slate political reporter.
<March 2008>
SMTWTFS
2425262728291
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Syndication