<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>kf is Stupid: 4 Health Care Questions</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/07/08/kf-is-stupid-4-health-care-questions.aspx</link><description>As a health care non-maven, I have four problems with the New Republic's strangely ungalvanizing description of a world without a "public option": 1) Jacob Hacker and Rahul Rajkumar suggest that, without a public option, a "59-year-old self-employed man</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>