<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Obama and Stem Cells, Continued</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/humannature/archive/2009/03/11/obama-and-stem-cells-continued.aspx</link><description>Is President Obama's decision to fund embryo-destructive stem-cell research purely scientific? Or is it also moral? I say it's moral . So do two thinkers from opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the Hastings Center's Bioethics Forum , Daniel Callahan,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>