<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Logic of Indefinite Dentention: How All the World's Militants Are Connected to the 9/11 Attacks</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/07/02/the-logic-of-indefinite-dentention-how-all-the-world-s-militants-are-connected-to-the-9-11-attacks.aspx</link><description>Can the president indefinitely detain someone who has no connection to al-Qaida and who has not engaged in any belligerent acts against the United States? Last week, an ideologically diverse panel (Judges Sentelle, Garland and Griffith) of the United</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>