<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Eighth Amendment Ratchet Puzzle in Kennedy v. Louisiana</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/06/25/the-eighth-amendment-ratchet-puzzle-in-kennedy-v-louisiana.aspx</link><description>Suppose that we simplify the court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence greatly and pretend that a "national consensus" against a certain type of punishment exists when 10 states or fewer authorize that punishment and not otherwise; and that when a national</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>