<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Thank You, Come Again?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/06/20/thank-you-come-again.aspx</link><description>David , I had precisely the same reaction to the jubilant op-ed in the Washington Post today—the one that crowed about the “sensible balance” struck by lawmakers who, in order to “avert another end run around FISA,” have now made it “clear that all intelligence</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>