<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Disagreements Both Modest and Fundamental</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/06/15/disagreements-both-modest-and-fundamental.aspx</link><description>There’s a lot of meat in Deborah’s and Marty’s posts to which I should respond. I’ll take on, first, Marty’s suggestion that habeas offers a good procedural device for resolving detention cases and then Deborah’s more fundamental suggestion that we shouldn’t</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>