<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Habeas Petitions in the Local D.C. Courts?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/06/11/habeas-petitions-in-the-local-d-c-courts.aspx</link><description>In an interesting new article in the Green Bag , Stephen Vladeck offers a creative solution to what he (and Justice Scalia, in INS v. St. Cyr ) refer to as the "one-way ratchet" of habeas corpus. To summarize Vladeck's point in the briefest of terms:</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>