<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What Would Be So Terrible About a Reversion to FISA?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/06/10/what-would-be-so-terrible-about-a-reversion-to-fisa.aspx</link><description>Come this August, some of the electronic surveillance orders that were approved pursuant to the 2007 Protect America Act will begin to expire. As of now, there is no consensus in Congress on a replacement statute; therefore, as the New York Times reports</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>