<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Katherine Kmiec's Bright Idea—Subsidize Families With Children </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/26/katherine-kmiec-s-bright-idea-subsidize-families-with-children.aspx</link><description>Now that the California Supreme Court has eliminated distinctions drawn on sexual orientation, is it time to recognize an even more important distinction between marriages -- those that devote themselves to having and raising children and those that don't</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>