<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Foreign Law and the Culture Wars</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/24/foreign-law-and-the-culture-wars.aspx</link><description>Diane makes an excellent point that no one appears upset with the D.C. Circuit's reliance on foreign practices in the recent currency case. In my view, the lack of reaction helps to confirm a theory I offered in a blog post in 2005 in response to an essay</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>