<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How the U.S. Supreme Court Is Not Like the Harry Potter Wizengamot</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/22/how-the-united-states-supreme-court-is-not-like-the-harry-potter-wizengamot.aspx</link><description>I agree that much of the Rasmussen poll puzzle presented by Eric is solved by the Findlaw survey results presented by Diane . I take Eric’s puzzle to be why Americans rate the Supreme Court more highly than its constituent members (especially when we</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>