<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Perhaps a &amp;quot;Lawyer's Lawyer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Judge's Judge&amp;quot; for the High Court</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/20/perhaps-a-lawyer-s-lawyer-or-judge-s-judge-for-the-high-court.aspx</link><description>It's disappointing that neither presumptive presidential nominee names John Paul Stevens as the type of justice whom he'd like to nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court. This is not to say that Stevens, a Republican appointee, belongs in every pantheon of</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>