<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Guest Post by Robert Weisberg on the Relationship Between &amp;quot;Actvism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Federalism&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/19/a-guest-post-by-robert-weisberg-on-the-relationship-between-actvism-and-federalism.aspx</link><description>Robert Weisberg, of Stanford Law School, offers a guest post: Dahlia Lithwick’s latest column about the California marriage decision shows how the availability of the "activism” trope is more than the intelligence (or other virtues like rationality, sanity,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>