<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is Liberal Constitutionalism &amp;quot;More Honest&amp;quot; Than Justice Scalia?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/12/is-liberal-constitutionalism-more-honest-than-justice-scalia.aspx</link><description>Yes , says Jack, but how can one compare the honesty of a person and a theory? It's like saying that the theory of evolution is more honest than William Paley. Jack might mean that Scalia doesn't apply his theory of originalism honestly, or he might mean</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>