<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Marty Asks, What's Law Got To Do With It?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/05/marty-asks-what-s-law-got-to-do-with-it.aspx</link><description>I'll get back to the substance of our legal debate on presidential authority in a sec, but first a response to Marty's two more general points. Does anyone care what the Somalia air strikes tell us about the current legal status of the "war on terror"?</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>