<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Re: His Accidency?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/02/re-his-accidency.aspx</link><description>Professor Sam Bagenstos kindly responded to my post on Brennan's "accidental" rise to the Supreme Court: There are certainly elements of the mistaken-identity story that are true, but I don't think Regnery is right that Brownell thought Brennan was a</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>