<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Federal Case?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/18/a-federal-case.aspx</link><description>I think Judge Gertner's right -- there are some things which flatly shouldn't be a federal case. I'm reminded here of the so-called "felon in possession" cases I saw while working as an extern in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles. Under federal</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>