<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Re:  The Climate Litigation Danger</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/17/re-the-climate-litigation-danger.aspx</link><description>Eric, perhaps your reference to the EPA is a veiled reference to Massachusetts v. EPA , but if not then I would note that the Supreme Court considered your line of reasoning in its April 2007 decision, and flatly rejected it in the context of its standing</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>