<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Predicting Supreme Court Votes by Ignoring Confirmation Hearings</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/14/predicting-supreme-court-votes-by-ignoring-confirmation-hearings.aspx</link><description>A New York Times editorial , citing a recent study , complains that Supreme Court nominees don't tell the truth during their confirmation hearings, which makes it hard to predict how they will behave on the bench. The study measures the degree to which</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>