<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Home Rule in the Breach</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/10/home-rule-in-the-breach.aspx</link><description>David, your point about home rule is well taken, but even in cities with broad home rule, local authority is often quite limited. Two examples from the city that knows how (but still can’t, as it happens). California cities have very broad home-rule powers—among</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>