<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Blueprint Originalism</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/09/blueprint-originalism.aspx</link><description>Jack tries to reconcile his commitments to originalism and to living constitutionalism by arguing that originalism supplies general principles that later constitutional interpreters (judges and others) must obey even while they update constitutional rules</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>