<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reply to Marty</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/07/reply-to-marty.aspx</link><description>Morally relevant, Marty, not legally relevant. That a law exists does not mean that it is a good law. On the second point: not "two wrongs make a right," but "historic practice has been to balance security and other values," and one shouldn't be fooled</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>