<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What's Law Got To Do With It?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/07/what-s-law-got-to-do-with-it.aspx</link><description>Eric makes at least two arguments in response to my claim the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques would violate the Geneva Conventions and the Convention Against Torture. First, he claims that "treaties are only as good as the underlying logic of</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>