<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is an Objective Appraisal of John Yoo's Work Possible?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/03/is-an-objective-appraisal-of-john-yoo-s-work-possible.aspx</link><description>John Yoo is a scholar of the first-rank. He confronted a legal and factual problem unlike any other public servant before him. With hardly any law, and even less direct judicial precedent, he reached plausible, but not always, prudent conclusions. If</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>