<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>John Yoo's Living Constitutionalism</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/02/john-yoo-s-living-constitutionalism.aspx</link><description>My reaction to the Yoo memo is almost the exact opposite of Emily's : I'm struck by how lawyerly it reads. It cites tons of authority, hedges arguments, discusses counterarguments, and generally reads like a careful lawyer's work. In fact, if it were</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>