<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Are We All Balkinists Now?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/04/01/are-we-all-balkinists-now.aspx</link><description>Jack, I'm curious, based on your response to Eric's post -- and implicitly, to my earlier one -- are there any past or current Supreme Court Justices whose decisions are not on the whole reasonably consistent with your advice? My earlier understanding</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>