<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Defending My &amp;quot;Devotion to the Forms of Legality,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Verging on Fanaticism&amp;quot; </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/28/defending-my-devotion-to-the-forms-of-legality-verging-on-fanaticism.aspx</link><description>Guilty as charged . Yes, careful lawyer that I try to be, I did include a qualification to suggest that maybe there could, one day, be some case in which a newspaper should refrain from publishing a story about rampant illegality, affecting the privacy</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>