<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reply to David Regarding The Times and the NSA Program</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/27/reply-to-david-regarding-the-times-and-the-nsa-program.aspx</link><description>David , there was nothing "abstract" about what The Times was doing. Are you saying that any possible harm to national security was negligible, or irrelevant? I did not argue that The Times should not have disclosed the existence of the program, a question</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>