<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mr. Dooley smokes a ham*</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/27/mr-dooley-smokes-a-ham.aspx</link><description>Jack's got it right when he writes: " Don't assume that living constitutionalism only swings to the left. It doesn't." And that's a lesson that extends beyond the question of whether today, 217 years after ratification, the 2d Amendment to the U.S. Constitution</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>