<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More Confusion About &amp;quot;Conservative Jurisprudence&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/23/more-confusion-about-conservative-jurisprudence.aspx</link><description>Adam, thanks; your admirably patient response clears things up a little, but at the risk of trying your patience further, I must admit that my confusion has not dissipated. You say "conservative jurisprudence" means "only those methods of legal analysis</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>