<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The drawbacks of living constitutionalism? Perish the thought!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/21/the-drawbacks-of-living-constitutionalism-perish-the-thought.aspx</link><description>I must confess, Dahlia, that you saw something in my last post that I didn't see. I was not writing about the "drawbacks of living constitutionalism," but about how living constitutionalism of the kind you like actually works. You seem to think that there</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>