<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Terror Tribunals, To Be Continued</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/21/the-terror-tribunals-to-be-continued.aspx</link><description>Ben, you posed great questions the other day about the 9/11 plotters, their culpability and appropriate punishment, the due process that the military tribunals set up to try them could deliver, and, especially, what "real due process" would look like</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>