<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Constitutionalism: It's Political, It's Legal-- It's Two Mints in One!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/03/20/constitutionalism-it-s-political-it-s-legal-it-s-two-mints-in-one.aspx</link><description>Dahlia Lithwick and Eric Posner question my political science-style account of living constitutionalism , in which popular mobilization and partisan entrenchment in the judiciary play a major role in shaping constitutional change. Dahlia doesn't like</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator></channel></rss>